That’s what one taxpayer hopes to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court. She has been representing herself in a tax case because she could not obtain legal counsel. She lost in the Tax Court and on appeal, where she was held liable for tax deficiencies and penalties relating to her 1994 income taxes stemming from a successful award for wrongful discharge and back wages. Now she’s asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her case.
She is arguing that the complexity of the tax laws, combined with a lack of right to counsel (as is the right in a criminal matter), deprive her of her constitutional rights. More specifically, she maintains that her Fifth Amendment right to due process has been violated because she could not present an adequate case.
Whether the high court will grant her petition for certiorari remains to be seen.
Source: Deborah A. Messina
Depreciation methods that allow faster write-offs than straight-line rates in the earlier periods of the useful life of an asset. For example, in the first few years of recovery, MACRS allows a 200% double declining balance write-off, twice the straight-line rate.